UAAP board: Swimmer Mikee Bartolome needs one year of residency


(From left to right) Vic Bartolome, swimmer Mikee and Sen. Pia Cayetano in a press conference. / CELEST FLORES

MANILA, Philippines — The UAAP board on Friday said that swimmer Mikee Bartolome still needs to serve a year of residency even after she has secured a court injuction against the two-year residency rule.

The league insisted that it remains respectful of the court’s granting of the temporary restraining order, but has no recourse “but to heed and revert to the previous rule which has been imposed for decades.”

“The court order was specific on the “two-year” rule which was imposed only this Season 76, and not on the previously accepted “one-year” rule,” the board also said.

The old rule requires a freshman student-athlete who transfers from one UAAP school to another to complete one year of residency.

Bartolome, though, was able to suit up for the Maroons in the first day of the ongoing UAAP season 76 swimming competitions at Trace College in Los Baños, Laguna.

But the father of the 17-year-old tanker said that only the swimming director and commissioner gave the green light for fear of contempt amid the instruction of the UAAP board not to let Mikee compete.

“Ayaw syang payagan, pero syempre natatakot yung director ng swimming at commissioner kasi nag-consult sila sa laywer. Ang sabi sa kanila, pag di nyo pinayagan, kasama kayo mako-contempt (They won’t let her compete, but the swimming director and commissioner got scared after consulting a lawyer who told them they might face contempt),” Vic Bartolome said in a phone call.

The league, meanwhile, said that Mikee, “like all other freshman transferees before her, must undergo the one-year residency before she could swim for UP.”

This confusion even sparked an alleged boycott among other schools as they refused to swim in the selected events in the women’s joust that Bartolome is competing in.

In the women’s 4×50 medley relay, only UP and Ateneo were left to dispute the medals with the Maroons eventually bagging gold with Bartolome’s help.

The UAAP board, though, said that it did not order such boycott and deemed the moved as the “schools’ decision, perhaps as a sign of personal indignation or protest.”

Senator Pia Cayetano, a staunch critic of the two-year residency rule and supporter of the Bartolomes in their legal battle, slammed the reported boycott.

“I condemn the boycott instigated by certain school officials  at the UAAP swimming competitions in support of the UAAP Board’s brazen refusal to abide by the court rulings affirming Mikee Bartolome’s right to swim in the school of her choice,” she said a statement.

Get Inquirer updates while on the go, add us on these apps:

Inquirer Viber

Disclaimer: The comments uploaded on this site do not necessarily represent or reflect the views of management and owner of We reserve the right to exclude comments that we deem to be inconsistent with our editorial standards.

  • jtclassic

    I really can’t appreciate this UAAP rule, whether it’s a one-year or a two-year residency, when they apply it to an incoming freshman. It’s one thing when someone starts college in one university, then transfers to another. However, when a person graduates from high school, he/she should be free to choose his/her college. It’s not transferring. The person is a graduate, not a transferee. It’s about starting out fresh. The term “freshman transferees,” as used in the article, should apply only to freshmen who enroll in one university, then transfer to another during the schoolyear. Freshmen are called freshmen because they’re supposed to be starting out fresh. First year, clean slate. So many possibilities. It should be about them, not the university. How can these young talents start out fresh if they’re shackled by a residency rule?

  • jctmpt

    The TRO was for the 2-year rule and not the original 1-year ban. By participating immediately, Ms. Bernabe was clearly “jumping the line” while many other athletes had to wait out the 1-year requirement.
    Her pushy father and outspoken PIa Cayetano are clearly to be blamed for the situation.

    • haha123

      The TRO was granted to let her compete. The UAAP board is just trying to skirt around the court ruling by trying to make this decision of imposing the old rule with no clear basis. And actually, this issue is about letting athletes compete wherever they may choose to, and not wasting their talent just because of politics between the these power-tripping institutions. BTW, who the hell is Ms. Bernabe?

To subscribe to the Philippine Daily Inquirer newspaper in the Philippines, call +63 2 896-6000 for Metro Manila and Metro Cebu or email your subscription request here.

Factual errors? Contact the Philippine Daily Inquirer's day desk. Believe this article violates journalistic ethics? Contact the Inquirer's Reader's Advocate. Or write The Readers' Advocate:

c/o Philippine Daily Inquirer Chino Roces Avenue corner Yague and Mascardo Streets, Makati City,Metro Manila, Philippines Or fax nos. +63 2 8974793 to 94


editors' picks



latest videos