Spurs’ turn to sputter in NBA Finals | Inquirer Sports
Bare Eye

Spurs’ turn to sputter in NBA Finals

Was it a case of Tim Duncan reprising the LeBron James burnout at the height of a critical NBA Finals game windup?

Game 2 in the ongoing NBA crown series was, as pundits love to put it, a lot closer than the final 98-96 score indicated.

The match, played under old conditions with the defective air-conditioning system at AT&T Center in San Antonio back like new, could’ve been decided by a single point, or could’ve gone into extension.

Article continues after this advertisement

* * *

FEATURED STORIES

But something in the tested San Antonio team communication system malfunctioned, with the suddenly erratic Duncan falling to indecision and flubbing a basic interior relay, thus throwing a match that could’ve given them a 2-0 lead.

Of course, before this, there was the case of Duncan and the old reliable Tony Parker miserably missing four consecutive free throws between them, with the Spurs up by two and needing only maybe a single point for a fair closing cushion.

Article continues after this advertisement

The Spurs, in short, sputtered in the thick of pressure, an area where they’ve patented an enviable survival pattern.  It was a case of the San Antonio fool-proof machine blinking when it was least expected.

Article continues after this advertisement

* * *

Article continues after this advertisement

Meanwnhile, James, singlehandedly blamed for Miami’s fall in Game 1, was back at his magnificent self, although there was not much of his dam-burst heroics this time out.

James yesterday opted to be rested several times to prevent a repeat of the hideous Game 1 burnout, where he was sidelined in the last four minutes due to cramps.

Article continues after this advertisement

He also took it upon himself to play a controlled thinking game.

Later, James told a female interviewer that his teammates did provide him enough support and moving room to play his usual game.

* * *

The tied series thus resumes as a normal coach-vs-coach encounter after it had initially been predicted to start as a Gregg Popovich-James Finals.

Miami’s Erik Spoelstra himself displayed commendable maturity, like James himself, as he ably countered and jammed San Antonio’s tested selfless move-around offensive.

Out there in San Antonio, there were postgame taunts that this time out, with the airconditoning system working, the Spurs fell prey to the Real Heat.

* * *

There’s a whole world of significance in yesterday’s result.

“Based on playoff records this year, it looks like the Heat might make it three NBA crowns in a row,” notes sharp-eyed Joseph Dumuk, former chief national sports statistician. “The Heat have not lost in seven home games while the Spurs are 10-2.

“In away games, SA has five losses in eight; while MIA has won six in ten,” he adds. “However, I still think the Spurs could have a ‘Swan Song’ for Duncan, Parker and Ginobili-atoning for last year’s Game 6 nightmare.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

“The ‘Heart’ might still swing it for the Spurs.”

TAGS: Basketball, NBA Finals

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.