WBC orders Gaballo-Rodriguez rematch after controversial win | Inquirer Sports

WBC orders Gaballo-Rodriguez rematch after controversial win

By: - Reporter / @MarkGiongcoINQ
/ 03:42 PM January 27, 2021

Reymart Gaballo Emmanuel Rodriguez

Reymart Gaballo. Photo from Showtime Boxing’s Twitter

MANILA, Philippines — Filipino prospect Reymart Gaballo will get the chance to prove his controversial win over Emmanuel Rodriguez was no fluke.

The World Boxing Council (WBC) has ordered a rematch between Gaballo and Rodriguez after the Polomolok, South Cotabato native escaped with a split decision win last month in Connecticut, USA.

Article continues after this advertisement

The outcome raised eyebrows as many were convinced that Rodriguez did enough to win the bout. Rodriguez’s camp officially put the bout under protest.

FEATURED STORIES

“After a formal appeal was received by the WBC a committee of ring officials completed a thorough analysis and review of the match, resulting in the order of free negotiations for an immediate rematch between Gaballo and Rodríguez,” the WBC announced as posted on boxingscene.com.

The two judges scored the fight, 116-112 and 115-113 for Gaballo, who claimed the WBC interim belt, while the other had it 118-110 for Rodriguez.

Article continues after this advertisement

The victory kept the 24-year-old Gaballo undefeated at 24-0 with 20 knockouts while Rodriguez, the former IBF champion, dropped to 19-2, 12 KOs.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: bantamweight, Boxing, Emmanuel Rodriguez, rematch, Reymart Gaballo, WBC

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.