Pranksters hijack Djokovic's virtual court hearing to stream music and porn | Inquirer Sports

Pranksters hijack Djokovic’s virtual court hearing to stream music and porn

/ 05:47 PM January 10, 2022

Supporters of Serbian tennis player Novak Djokovic rally outside the Federal Court of Australia, while the star athlete is in the midst of a legal battle over his visa to enter the country and play in the Australian Open, in Melbourne, Australia, January 10, 2022. REUTERS/Sandra Sanders

SYDNEY – Australia’s efforts to let the media and public watch tennis superstar Novak Djokovic’s court appeal against his visa cancellation descended into farce on Monday as pranksters hijacked the internet links to stream loud music and porn.

Due to coronavirus restrictions, the hearing was conducted virtually, through audio visual links between the judge’s chambers and lawyers for the government and Djokovic.

Article continues after this advertisement

Minutes before proceedings were due to begin, journalists clicked on a just-expired Microsoft Teams link supplied by the court, unaware that the court had replaced the link. Expecting to see proceedings in real time, they were instead confronted with pornographic images.

FEATURED STORIES

News Corp’s head of digital sport, Emily Benammar, observed wryly that the online intruders had at least supplied a missing ingredient in what had become one of Australia’s biggest court room dramas of recent years.

“Porn: the one thing this whole Djokovic saga had been missing,” Benammar said in a tweet.

Article continues after this advertisement

Australian journalist Sarah Dankert described the ensuing chaos, including some joker groaning “Nole”, a diminutive for Novak.

Article continues after this advertisement

“While there’s a public broadcast, there’s an old teams link that is still working for the Djokovic case and the court official is gone after having trouble with mute all.

Article continues after this advertisement

“We’ve had techno blasting, giggling, shouting and someone is just saying Nole repeatedly in a pained voice.”

That link, which had been shared widely on social media in the days prior, had been replaced by a new link, which the court sent around to media. And when the hearing was scheduled to begin, at 10 a.m., the new link led to a website which had crashed due to over-visitation.

Article continues after this advertisement

The trouble didn’t end there. Once the link was back up and running, the court proceedings were accidentally interrupted by a member of the public, who joined the live stream but was not on mute. “We’re in,” the person said, prompting a rebuke from Judge Anthony Kelly.

“Can I ask whoever is on screen to mute themselves… the only people who should be online with their microphones are those who are making submissions to the court,” Judge Kelly said.

Though some outlets could watch the federal court hearing online, most had to rely on a re-broadcast by a tennis podcast which supplied commentary over the voices of lawyers.

A court spokesman was not immediately available for comment, but apologized for the technical difficulties in a email to media.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

Four hours into the hearing, the court sent around a third link – to its own YouTube channel – just in time for a belated lunch break. After stop-start adjournments lasting three hours, at 5:12 p.m., the link worked, just in time for the final ruling: Djokovic should be free to enter the country.

RELATED STORIES

Nadal calls Djokovic controversy ‘a circus’

Novak Djokovic wins fresh deportation delay

TAGS: Novak Djokovic

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.