Victims of abuse by football coach lose damages claim against Man City | Inquirer Sports

Victims of abuse by football coach lose damages claim against Man City

/ 09:05 PM January 10, 2022

FILE – Abuse victims of former football coach Barry Bennell (L-R) Micky Fallon, Steve Walters and Chris Unsworth speak outside Liverpool Crown Court on February 19, 2018 after the sentencing of former football coach Barry Bennell who was found guilty of sexual abuse. – Former British football trainer Barry Bennell was sentenced to 30 years in prison on February 19 for abusing 12 boys he coached between 1979 and 1991, with the judge branding him “sheer evil”. (Photo by Anthony Devlin / AFP)

Eight men who sued English Premier League club Manchester City after complaining of being abused by a pedophile coach more than 30 years ago on Monday lost a court fight for damages.

The men, in their 40s and 50s, said Barry Bennell, now 68, abused them when they were playing schoolboy football for teams he coached in northwest England between 1979 and 1985.

Article continues after this advertisement

The former youth coach is serving a long prison sentence after being convicted in recent years of numerous sexual offenses against children.

FEATURED STORIES

The men claimed that Bennell was a scout for City when they were abused and argued the relationship between him and the club was “one of employment or one akin to employment”.

The eight men claimed damages for psychiatric injuries and six of them also claimed damages for loss of potential football earnings.

Article continues after this advertisement

City said Bennell was a local City scout in the mid-1970s but not when the men were abused.

Article continues after this advertisement

But Judge Jeremy Johnson ruled against the claimants at the High Court in London on Monday.

Article continues after this advertisement

He said the connection between the abuse and Bennell’s relationship with City was insufficient to give rise to “vicarious liability”.

“The relationship gave Bennell the opportunity to commit the abuse, but MCFC had not entrusted the welfare of the claimants to Bennell,” he said.

Article continues after this advertisement

“It follows that it has not been shown that MCFC is legally responsible for Bennell’s acts of abuse.”

Bennell told the judge that he had been a “local scout” for City between 1975 and 1979, but not between 1979 and 1985.

But he told the judge that he had “always used and exploited” his previous connections with City for his “own benefit”.

Lawyer David McClenaghan, who represented the men, said there would be an appeal, stating that his clients were “shocked and dismayed” at the court decision.

“Despite the judge accepting that there was a connection between Bennell and Man City and that he was scouting for them, coaching their feeder teams and helping to organize trial games for them, the club has escaped liability on a technicality,” he said.

A Manchester City spokeswoman said it would be inappropriate to comment in detail in light of the intention to appeal.

She said City has “both personally and publicly apologized without reservation for the unimaginable suffering that each survivor experienced as the result of abuse they suffered”.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

“The club reiterates this apology today to the survivors and to the multiple family members and friends affected by the traumatic events,” she added.

RELATED STORIES

Simone Biles condemns US Olympic Committee, FBI for sex-abuse crisis

Stephens suffers abuse on social media after US Open loss

TAGS:

No tags found for this post.
Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.