Phil, James controversy hangs in air | Inquirer Sports
In Huddle

Phil, James controversy hangs in air

/ 02:13 AM September 30, 2012

DURING the open forum portion of the  recent United Football League (UFL) press conference, I expected one of the scribes  to inquire about the latest Younghusband controversy.

The Philippine Football Federation had earlier dropped brothers Phil and James Younghusband  from the Azkals team  that competed in the four-nation Paulino Alcantara Cup which ended yesterday at Rizal Memorial Stadium.

Whether  this situation is temporary or permanent, only time will tell. The PFF said they had scrapped  the Younghusbands from the Azkals roster because they could not meet their demands which  was described as “both economic and non-economic.”

Article continues after this advertisement

The way  I understand it, these demands were pre-conditions set by the Younghusbands for them to play in  the international commitments of the PFF.

FEATURED STORIES

***

In last Friday’s presscon, hosted by television coveror AKTV,  I thought I would finally get to find out  exactly what the Younghusbands wanted from the PFF.

Article continues after this advertisement

The Fil-British brothers have never struck me as the material type, and I, for one, have always written about them in glorious terms,  praising them for their various football advocacies which they started long before  Team Azkals was born. To this day, they continue these advocacies.

Article continues after this advertisement

It was hard to reconcile my impression of the Younghusbands with the Younghusbands who were making  what was perceived as outrageous demands.

Article continues after this advertisement

But people change, and  the Younghusbands are  just humans. I have heard from  sources  that they have been under  the tutelage of their  manager Cathy Rivilla, who could have taught them the Gospel of Greed and changed their values.

They say she charges an appearance fee even for an invitation to a birthday party.

Article continues after this advertisement

One of my colleagues also said that the  “economics” being demanded from the PFF by the Younghusbands  was most likely the idea of the manager.

“The figure being demanded is way above  the amount being received by  the  rest of the Azkals,” my colleague said.

***

Last Friday, I waited and waited  for someone to  broach the subject but it seemed that  everyone was just too shy. The non-economic issue, as elucidated by the Younghusbands themselves on national television, did not appear as a problem because UFL president Randy Roxas explained that the league always gave way to the schedule of the PFF.

The emcee was about to close the session, but I  just had to ask for the mike. It was obvious nobody wanted to touch the Younghusband issue.  Not Randy Roxas,  who explained that  the UFL only gave way to Fifa-sanctioned  tournaments or the Younghusbands’ manager Cathy Rivilla,  who begged off from  discussing the sensitive issue of economics.

Only after I talked with  Meralco Sparks chairman Al Panilio did I get a clear grasp of the situation.

***

“The PFF does not  respect the commitments of the club players,” he said. “We have met with coach (Michael) Weiss too  in making sure we align skeds, but to no avail. We asked them to sit down with us so we can plot a compromise.”

Al informed us that  the Meralco Sparks  are leaving for Singapore next week to compete in an international tournament.

He admitted he was disappointed with the PFF  which  is being subsidized by the MVP Sports Foundation, of which he is the president.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

“I’m not happy with the way they are running the national team,” Al said.

TAGS: Football, James Younghusband, Phil Younghusband, Philippine Football Federation, United Football League (UFL)

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.