No tuneup: Roach wants Marquez after Pacquiao ban | Inquirer Sports

No tuneup: Roach wants Marquez after Pacquiao ban

By: - Editor / @RLuarcaINQ
/ 10:00 PM January 14, 2013

If Freddie Roach had his way, there’s no need for Manny Pacquiao to go through a tuneup fight in April.

The Hall of Fame trainer wants Pacquiao to tangle with Juan Manuel Marquez right away in September.

Though aware that negotiations are underway for Pacquiao to fight either on April 13 or April 20 outside the United States, Roach told fighthub.tv that he would prefer that Pacquiao skip the bout and prepare for a grudge rematch with Marquez instead.

Article continues after this advertisement

“I don’t really want the tuneup fight,” Roach said. “I would rather just go straight into the fifth fight (with Marquez).”

FEATURED STORIES

In their fourth bout last Dec. 8, Marquez caught Pacquiao with a right straight coming in and knocked out the Filipino eight-division world champion cold with one second to go in the sixth round.

Pacquiao later told Roach his desire to fight Marquez one more time.

Article continues after this advertisement

After being cleared of head injuries, however, Pacquiao is pining for an early return and has given his adviser, Mike Koncz, the signal to seek a fight through Top Rank Promotions.

In a television interview on Sunday, Koncz said nine names—among them, Timothy Bradley, Vyacheslav Senchenko, Jessie Vargas—are being considered for Pacquiao’s return fight which could be held in Macau, Singapore or Abu Dhabi for “lesser tax” purposes.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: Boxing, Freddie Roach, Juan Manuel Marquez, Manny Pacquiao

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.