London High Court to rule whether card game bridge a sport | Inquirer Sports

London High Court to rule whether card game bridge a sport

/ 09:13 AM September 24, 2015

Sport England

SCREENGRAB from Sport England website

LONDON, United Kingdom—Practitioners of the card game bridge are appearing in London’s High Court this week to argue that their pastime deserves to be considered a sport.

The English Bridge Union (EBU) took legal action after British funding body Sport England refused to recognize it as such, preventing the EBU from taking part in international competitions.

Article continues after this advertisement

“Sport England refused to recognize bridge as a sport, a position which the EBU believes to be inconsistent with both the wishes of Parliament, and the opinion of significant international sporting organisations,” said an EBU spokesman.

FEATURED STORIES

He said that bridge required “undoubted levels of mental skill” and had “known health benefits.”

Lawyers acting for the EBU will point out that chess is recognized as a sport by the International Olympic Committee and that both chess and bridge have been invited to apply for inclusion at the 2020 Tokyo Games.

Article continues after this advertisement

Jeremy Dhondy, a leading bridge player and EBU chairman, said: “We hope that this hearing will allow bridge to be recognised in the way that it should.”

Bridge, also known as contact bridge, is a “trick-taking” game involving four players in two competing partnerships and is one of the world’s most popular card games.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: Bridge, Britain, Game, Offbeat

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.