Pistorius faces return to jail for lover's murder | Inquirer Sports

Pistorius faces return to jail for lover’s murder

/ 10:25 AM June 11, 2016

APTOPIX South Africa Pistorius Sentencing

Oscar Pistorius arrives at the High Court ahead of today’s postponement hearing in Pretoria, South Africa on Monday, April 18, 2016. The South African former Olympic track star Oscar Pistorius appeared briefly in court where a judge scheduled five days in June to determine his sentence for the conviction of murdering his girlfriend. Pool Photo via AP

JOHANNESBURG, South Africa—Disgraced South African Paralympic athlete Oscar Pistorius will appear in court Monday for a sentencing hearing set to send him back to jail for murdering his girlfriend Reeva Steenkamp three years ago.

The double-amputee killed Steenkamp, a model and law graduate, in the early hours of Valentine’s Day 2013, saying he mistook her for an intruder when he fired four times through the door of his bedroom toilet.

Article continues after this advertisement

READ: South Africa: Pistorius to be sentenced in June for murder

FEATURED STORIES

In March, Pistorius’s lawyers failed in their legal bid to reverse a Supreme Court of Appeal judgement that upgraded his original conviction from culpable homicide—the equivalent of manslaughter—to murder.

He was released from jail last October to live under house arrest at his uncle’s mansion in Pretoria after serving one year of his five-year sentence for culpable homicide.

Article continues after this advertisement

Since being convicted of murder, he has been on bail and allowed to leave the house at set times, but not travel further than 20 kilometres (12 miles) without permission.

Article continues after this advertisement

The 29-year-old “Blade Runner” faces a minimum 15-year jail term for murder, but his sentence could be reduced due to time already spent in prison and mitigating factors, including his disability.

Article continues after this advertisement

READ: Oscar Pistorius: from Olympic fame to murder appeal

“He has served one year in prison and has been effectively on probation or correctional supervision,” Stephan Terblanche, a law professor at the University of South Africa, told AFP.

Article continues after this advertisement

“But exactly how that is going to be taken into account by the court is difficult to predict.”

The case at the High Court in Pretoria was scheduled to last until Friday, though the sentence could be handed down earlier.

Dramatic trial

“We are expecting that there will be evidence presented by both sides over three days and the judge may come back to deliver sentence on Friday,” a lawyer close to the case told AFP on condition of anonymity.

Pistorius was last seen in public at a court hearing in April when the date of the sentencing was announced.

He has always denied killing Steenkamp in a rage and, during his dramatic trial in 2014, sobbed in the dock as details of his lover’s death were examined in excruciating detail.

“I was overcome with fear,” Pistorius told the trial. “Before I knew it, I’d fired four shots at the door.”

The seven-month case gripped television audiences worldwide, drawing parallels with the 1995 murder trial of American football star O.J. Simpson.

Pistorius has shunned the media during years of intense coverage since Steenkamp’s killing, but his family revealed on Friday that he had given his first interview to a British broadcaster.

His uncle Arnold said that the interview, which will be screened after the sentencing, will “provide our family with a voice to address some of the misconceptions that have remained unchallenged.”

The programme is due to air on ITV on June 24.

The year before he killed Steenkamp, Pistorius became the first double-amputee to race at Olympic level when he appeared at the London 2012 games.

He has since lost his glittering sports career, lucrative contracts and status as a global role model for the disabled.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

Appeal judges in December described his testimony at his trial as “untruthful” and delivered a damning indictment of the original verdict.

TAGS: court, crime

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.